Aston Villa Backs Emery to Address the Crisis He’s Creating
Unai Emery remains the Aston Villa manager. Not because things are getting better, but because the board has fallen into a state of football-related Stockholm Syndrome. They’ve watched five games without a win, scored one goal, and drawn against ten-man Sunderland, and they’ve concluded, “Yes, this is the man to lead us into the light. Or at least into a well-lit relegation zone.”
The Board’s Statement: “We’re Not Panicking. We’re Just Meditating in a Burning Room.”
Let’s be clear: Villa sits at 19th place. They’ve only scored one goal in five matches. They just failed to beat a team that played with ten men for an hour. Most clubs would be holding crisis talks. Villa? They’re holding hands and whispering affirmations.
Reports indicate that the board has “no plans” to sack Emery. They’re supporting him. They believe in the project, the man, and something, though it isn’t defending set pieces or scoring goals.
This is loyalty that borders on performance art. Emery could show up in a bathrobe and field a midfield of inflatable flamingos, and the board would still release a statement about “long-term strategy.”
Emery’s Diagnosis: “We’ve Lost Our Identity”
After the Sunderland draw, Emery gave a post-match interview that sounded like someone struggling to figure out why their houseplants keep dying.
“I’m a little bit worried… not for the result and how we are in the table, but more so how we are not playing with our identity.”
What is this identity? Is it a formation? A philosophy? A recurring dream where Tyrone Mings is a lighthouse keeper and Ollie Watkins represents missed opportunity?
Villa’s current identity is “confused man walks into a pub and forgets why he’s there.” The midfield passes sideways like they’re avoiding confrontation. The attack moves as quickly as a Sunday stroll. The defense is merely a polite suggestion.
Villa’s tactical setup resembles a group therapy session where no one’s listening. The players seem to try to solve a crossword puzzle using only facial expressions. And Emery? He stands on the touchline, staring into the void as if it owes him money.
The Sunderland Match: A Masterclass in Doing Less With More
Villa finally scored, Matty Cash in the 67th minute, but still couldn’t beat a team that had been down to ten men since the 33rd minute. It wasn’t football. It was a live-action reenactment of a group project falling apart.
Sunderland, despite being short-handed, looked like they understood the assignment. Villa appeared to arrive with a PowerPoint titled “Let’s Just See What Happens.”
At one point, I genuinely thought the players were communicating through Morse code. There was movement, yes. But meaning? None. Watkins missed a clear chance that could have been used in a skincare ad. The midfield passed sideways like they were dodging responsibility. Meanwhile, Emery stood there, trying to remember if he left the oven on.
Why the Board Still Trusts Him
Let’s be fair. Emery did take Villa from 17th to Europe last season. He has a strong background and a history of winning trophies. But football doesn’t rely on memory; it depends on results. Right now, Villa is playing like a team allergic to its own identity.
The board’s reasoning:
• Last season’s turnaround was genuine
• Tactical experience: Emery’s background still shines
• Long-term vision: Villa wants stability, not another manager swap
But here’s the problem: stability only works if the ship isn’t actively sinking. Right now, Villa is clinging to the ghost of last season while the present burns like a Emi Buendia cross.
Is Emery still the right person to fix this mess? Or is Villa just another club addicted to the idea of “project football” while actual football goes missing like your dad during IKEA assembly? Feel free to comment, reply, or scream into the void, whatever helps you process this tactical identity crisis.
About the Author
